tc 71 cells (Charles River Laboratories)
Structured Review

Tc 71 Cells, supplied by Charles River Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tc+71+cells/pmc13012068-192-7-36?v=Charles+River+Laboratories
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "ROME, an Ancient Gene with a Novel Function in Vertebrates, Is a Key Modulator of Embryonal Development and Cancer Metastasis"
Article Title: ROME, an Ancient Gene with a Novel Function in Vertebrates, Is a Key Modulator of Embryonal Development and Cancer Metastasis
Journal: Cancer Research Communications
doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-26-0068
Figure Legend Snippet: ROME is a 153–amino acid transmembrane glycoprotein. A, Western blots of TC-71 lysates transfected with EV or ROME-HA for 24 hours blotted with the commercially available anti-HA antibody, ICD-6 (monoclonal antibody against the predicted ICD of ROME), and ECD-5 (monoclonal antibody against the predicted ECD of ROME) are shown. B, ROME was knocked out via CRISPR/Cas9 in TC-71 cells. Successful knockout was confirmed by immunoprecipitation and Western blotting with a ROME monoclonal antibody (ICD-6). C, Coomassie blue staining was used to verify the purity of recombinant ROME-FL and ECD proteins and the synthetic ICD peptide. Western blotting with ROME ICD-6 and ECD-5 monoclonal antibodies was performed to confirm protein identities. D, SPR sensorgrams demonstrating the binding of the anti-ROME monoclonal antibody ICD-6 to the ROME ICD and FL proteins and the binding of the anti-ROME monoclonal antibody ECD-5 to the ROME ECD and FL proteins. The antibodies were injected in duplicate at 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, and 6.25 nmol/L. The red lines are the actual data and the black lines indicate the curve fit. E, Three-dimensional structure of ROME predicted by AlphaFold. F, A diagram of the ROME amino acid sequence with three predicted domains is shown. Circles correspond to phosphorylation sites and triangles correspond to glycosylation sites. The black color designates sites predicted in silico and the blue color designates sites confirmed by MS. G, Homology between human, mouse, and zebrafish ROME proteins is shown. The Drosophila inaF motif (from the INAF-D protein) is shown for comparison. The black line box indicates the transmembrane domain. Asterisks (*) indicate identical amino acids (aa) and colons (:) indicate amino acids with similarity among all three species. H, Phylogenetic tree showing the high evolutionary conservation of the ROME protein in vertebrates. I, Compared with the eGFP control, ROME-GFP localizes to the plasma membrane of TC-71 cells (quantification shown in the graph to the right). J, ROME-HA was expressed in TC-71 cells and detected primarily in the membrane fraction, as well as the soluble nuclear fraction. α-Tubulin was used as a cytoplasmic fraction control, CD99 was used as a membrane fraction control, and lamin A/C was used as a soluble nuclear fraction control. K, Lysates from TC-71 cells transfected with EV or ROME-FLAG were treated with a deglycosylase mixture. Western blotting with anti-FLAG antibody was performed to detect ROME-FLAG.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Transfection, CRISPR, Knock-Out, Immunoprecipitation, Staining, Recombinant, Bioprocessing, Binding Assay, Injection, Sequencing, Phospho-proteomics, Glycoproteomics, In Silico, Comparison, Control, Clinical Proteomics, Membrane
Figure Legend Snippet: Genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 transcriptional activation screen reveals novel prometastatic genes in Ewing sarcoma. A, Schematic overview of the in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 genome-wide transcriptional activation screening experiment (TSS, transcription start site). B, Four Ewing sarcoma cell lines were injected into 48 hpf zebrafish embryos at three different cell densities ( n = 12 for each condition) and the number of fish with metastasis to the tail was scored every day for 5 days. C, Read counts per million for each gRNA detected from the genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 transcriptional activation screening experiment. The eight genes chosen for further study are indicated in bold. D, Eight candidate genes from the screen were stably overexpressed in TC-71 cells and tested in zebrafish xenograft assays (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; χ 2 test). The red line indicates the baseline intravasation of TC-71 cells transfected with EV. The means and SEMs are shown. The dots represent individual experiments and the total number of fish in all the experiments combined is provided above each condition. E, TC-71 cells stably overexpressing eight different genes were tested via a scratch assay. The dots indicate independent experiments. The means and SEMs are shown (*, P < 0.05, Student t test). The red line indicates the average percent wound closure of TC-71 cells transfected with EV. [ A, Created in BioRender. Lab, S. (2026) https://BioRender.com/pw6o2c1 .]
Techniques Used: Genome Wide, CRISPR, Activation Assay, In Vivo, Injection, Stable Transfection, Transfection, Wound Healing Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: ROME drives intravasation through vimentin. A, Timeline of zebrafish xenograft experiments. B, Zebrafish xenograft experiments with three different ROME-overexpressing Ewing sarcoma cell lines. Statistical significance was determined via the Fisher exact test (two-sided). C, Zebrafish xenograft experiments comparing WT and ROME-KO TC-71 cells. Statistical significance was determined via the Fisher exact test (one-sided). D, ROME and vimentin proteins co-immunoprecipitate in three different Ewing sarcoma cell lines. For TC-32 ROME blot, line denotes higher exposure on left to visualize input and lower exposure on right. E, SPR sensorgrams showing direct binding between the recombinant full-length ROME protein and vimentin protein. Vimentin was immobilized on the surface and full-length ROME protein was injected in duplicate at concentrations of 2,500, 800, 280, 90, 30, and 10 nmol/L. The red lines are the actual data, and the black lines indicate the curve fit. F, ROME expression reduces vimentin phosphorylation at serine 56 (S56) in a tet-inducible ROME-HA expression system (DOX = doxycycline 250 ng/mL). Densitometry analysis of Western blot bands is shown in the bottom right corner ( n = 4 independent experiments). G, Western blotting was used to confirm vimentin knockdown by siRNA in STA-ET-7.2 cells with EV or ROME overexpression. H, Vimentin knockdown selectively reduced ROME-driven intravasation in ROME-overexpressing STA-ET-7.2 cells compared with an EV control [ n = 102 (EV + siNT), 116 (ROME + siNT), 88 (EV + siVimentin), and 119 (ROME + siVimentin)]. I, ROME mRNA expression positively correlates with vimentin mRNA expression in analysis of 13,313 patient samples. [ A, Created in BioRender. Lab, S. (2026) https://BioRender.com/fp8c676 .]
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Recombinant, Injection, Expressing, Phospho-proteomics, Western Blot, Knockdown, Over Expression, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: ROME expression drives metastasis development in vivo . A, Timeline of tail vein metastasis experiments. B, In a tail vein metastasis model, mice injected with ROME-overexpressing TC-71 cells ( n = 11) had a higher total mass of metastatic nodules than did controls ( n = 10). C, In a tail vein metastasis model, mice injected with ROME-KO TC-71 cells ( n = 11) had a lower total mass of metastases than controls injected with WT TC71 cells ( n = 11). Statistical significance was determined via an unpaired t test (one-tailed) for B and C . D, Diagram of the orthotopic Ewing sarcoma leg amputation experimental timeline. E, Representative gross images of lungs from mice injected with TC-71 cells overexpressing ROME or with EV (left) with quantification (middle). Representative images of H&E staining are shown on the right confirming metastatic nodules in the lungs of SCID mice. Statistical significance was calculated by the Fisher exact test (one-sided). F, TC-71 ROME-KO cells displayed significantly reduced primary tumor recurrence [ n = 10 per group, log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test]. G, ROME is expressed throughout many different tumor types (CNS, central nervous system; HEPAC, hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangioma; KICH, kidney chromophobe and other renal carcinoma; KIPCC, papillary cell renal carcinoma; OV, ovarian cystadenocarcinoma; PAAD, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; PCPG, pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma; SCC/BLCA, squamous cell or bladder carcinoma; TGCT SEM, testicular germ cell tumor, seminoma). H, Kaplan–Meier curves of patient survival stratified by high (red line) and low (black line) ROME expression (from the Kaplan–Meier plotter database). [ A and D, Created in BioRender. Lab, S. (2026) https://BioRender.com/atgnfw0 .]
Techniques Used: Expressing, In Vivo, Injection, One-tailed Test, Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: ROME protein negatively regulates the Wnt pathway and calcium signaling in human cancer cells. A and B, Compared with EV control cells, TC-71 ( A ) and TC-32 ( B ) cells stably overexpressing ROME were less responsive to recombinant human Wnt3a protein as measured by TOPFlash β-catenin–responsive luciferase reporter. C, TC-71 cells with ROME knockdown by siRNA were more responsive to Wnt3a. D, Endogenous Wnt pathway activity in the colorectal cancer cell line HCT116 was significantly decreased by ROME expression (Western blots confirming ROME-HA expression on the right). Statistical significance was calculated by an unpaired t test (two-tailed) for A–D . E, ROME co-immunoprecipitates with β-catenin in β-catenin pulldown experiments. F, β-Catenin co-immunoprecipitates with ROME in ROME pulldown experiments. G, SPR sensorgrams showing direct binding between the recombinant full-length ROME protein and β-catenin protein. β-Catenin was immobilized on the surface and full-length ROME protein was injected in duplicate at concentrations of 1,250, 416.7, 138.9, 46.3, 15.4, and 5.12 nmol/L. The red lines are the actual data, and the black lines indicate the curve fit. H, ROME expression decreases β-catenin and TCF4 interaction (measured by co-IP). I–K, The Ca 2+ response was decreased in A4573, STA-ET-7.2, and TC-71 cells overexpressing ROME compared with that in EV-transfected cells when the cells were stimulated with ATP or FBS after overnight serum starvation. L, The Ca 2+ response was greater in the TC-71 cells with ROME KO than in the WT cells. Statistical significance was calculated by an unpaired t test (two-tailed) for I–L .
Techniques Used: Control, Stable Transfection, Recombinant, Luciferase, Knockdown, Activity Assay, Expressing, Western Blot, Two Tailed Test, Binding Assay, Injection, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Transfection
Figure Legend Snippet: ROME expression increases cell motility and chemotaxis in vitro . A, TC-71 cells stably overexpressing ROME demonstrated increased wound closure compared with that of a control cell line, and TC-71 cells with ROME KO by CRISPR/Cas9 demonstrated decreased wound closure compared with that of WT cells in scratch assays. At least two independent experiments were performed, and average wound closure with SEM was quantified. Statistical significance was calculated by an unpaired t test (two-tailed). B–E, Compared with EV control cells, A4573, TC-71, and Hs746.T cells stably expressing ROME presented increased chemotaxis in Boyden chamber assays. F, CHLA-10 cells with ROME KO via CRISPR/Cas9 showed decreased chemotaxis compared with that of WT cells. G–I, ROME KO (TC-71) or knockdown (769-P and Hs746.T) decreased the chemotaxis of cancer cells. J and K, Rescue of ROME expression by an exogenous vector restored chemotaxis in both CHLA-10 and TC-71 cells. At least two independent experiments with three biological replicates were performed for each Boyden chamber assay. Statistical significance was calculated by an unpaired t test (two-tailed).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Chemotaxis Assay, In Vitro, Stable Transfection, Control, CRISPR, Two Tailed Test, Knockdown, Plasmid Preparation, Boyden Chamber Assay
